<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Haskell bookshelf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/</link>
	<description>random thoughts on programming and programming languages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Morgan</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice list. I learnt Haskell from Simon Thompson&#039;s Craft of functional programming. One other excellent resource for advanced Haskell programming, indeed the one I consider to have been most helpful in my experiance, is the wiki on haskell.org.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice list. I learnt Haskell from Simon Thompson&#8217;s Craft of functional programming. One other excellent resource for advanced Haskell programming, indeed the one I consider to have been most helpful in my experiance, is the wiki on haskell.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jao</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simen, that&#039;s right: Haskell is usually considered more purely functional because it does not allow side-effects (no mutable variables). When they&#039;re absolutely necessary (e.g., in input/output operations), they&#039;re hidden away inside monads. Another interesting feature separating Haskell from Lisp (although this one does not make it &#039;more functional&#039;) is lazy evaluation. In general, as any lisper will tell you, Lisp (and specially Common Lisp) tries hard not to impose a single paradigm (functional or any other) on you (at the cost, sometimes, of convenience: e.g. lazy evaluation is possible but a bit cumbersome).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simen, that&#8217;s right: Haskell is usually considered more purely functional because it does not allow side-effects (no mutable variables). When they&#8217;re absolutely necessary (e.g., in input/output operations), they&#8217;re hidden away inside monads. Another interesting feature separating Haskell from Lisp (although this one does not make it &#8216;more functional&#8217;) is lazy evaluation. In general, as any lisper will tell you, Lisp (and specially Common Lisp) tries hard not to impose a single paradigm (functional or any other) on you (at the cost, sometimes, of convenience: e.g. lazy evaluation is possible but a bit cumbersome).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mag</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. Wow, an impressive set of links. Really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Wow, an impressive set of links. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hobbit Hole &#187; Scheme in Haskell</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hobbit Hole &#187; Scheme in Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This guy is interesting and has several good articles on programming, though I think this is my favorite so far. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This guy is interesting and has several good articles on programming, though I think this is my favorite so far. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simen</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be sure to check out the &quot;Write yourself a Scheme in 48 hours&quot; tutorial. I&#039;ve been playing with Scheme ( and Common Lisp ) lately, and it&#039;s great fun. If I&#039;ve understood it right, Haskell is a more &quot;pure&quot; functional language than the various Lisps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be sure to check out the &#8220;Write yourself a Scheme in 48 hours&#8221; tutorial. I&#8217;ve been playing with Scheme ( and Common Lisp ) lately, and it&#8217;s great fun. If I&#8217;ve understood it right, Haskell is a more &#8220;pure&#8221; functional language than the various Lisps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Haniford</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Haniford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, an impressive set of links.  It looks like you&#039;ve laid out all the resources anybody would need to dive into the Function/Haskell world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, an impressive set of links.  It looks like you&#8217;ve laid out all the resources anybody would need to dive into the Function/Haskell world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: make it functional &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Haskell: 48시간 안에 인터프리터 만들기</title>
		<link>http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[make it functional &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Haskell: 48시간 안에 인터프리터 만들기]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 그 외에 http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/에 소개된 책들을 읽어보는 것도 괜찮겠다. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 그 외에 <a href="http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/에" rel="nofollow">http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/에</a> 소개된 책들을 읽어보는 것도 괜찮겠다. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

