Comments for programming musings http://programming-musings.org random thoughts on programming and programming languagesSat, 08 Oct 2011 02:30:49 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on The Joy of REPL by withoutasppon http://programming-musings.org/2006/01/14/the-joy-of-repl/#comment-31366 Sat, 08 Oct 2011 02:30:49 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/01/14/the-joy-of-repl/#comment-31366I still have yet to use a serious application written in any of these tard languages ]]>Comment on Scheme lectures, mostly by p4bl0 http://programming-musings.org/2009/12/23/scheme-lectures-mostly/#comment-31355 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:01:57 +0000http://programming-musings.org/?p=295#comment-31355http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3be1PHW5X0 here is a version with the sound and image in sync of Matthias Felleisen talk. ]]>Comment on Programmers love writing (and mocking) tests by moigouddy http://programming-musings.org/2006/01/25/programmers-love-writing-and-mocking-tests/#comment-31352 Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:32:01 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/01/25/programmers-love-writing-and-mocking-tests/#comment-31352Hello all! I like this forum, i inaugurate many interesting people on this forum.!!!

Large Community, respect all!

]]>Comment on A Scheme bookshelf by JJ is une crétin http://programming-musings.org/2007/01/31/a-scheme-bookshelf/#comment-31349 Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:59:35 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/a-scheme-bookshelf/#comment-31349Knowing “a little” English will not help you read at a technical level, which is what these books are. It takes at least 500-900 hours of constant study to achieve a “near native” fluency in a language (and that goes for everyone. You are not special, you would not whiz through it faster)

So, idiot, he is not talking about learning a “little french” – the kind you would get from a dozen hours of study, the ability to use a few common phrases like “Where is the bathroom?”. To read at a 16th grade level, you’d need many solid months.

>loosing

losing. Learn a little English

]]>Comment on The Beginning of NeXT by foljs http://programming-musings.org/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31339 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:31:28 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31339And that’s NeXT?

Oh, and you have a Windows icon as your avatar?

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

]]>Comment on The Beginning of NeXT by WayneB http://programming-musings.org/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31338 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:48:27 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31338Yay for poorly designed and inconsistent operating systems and programming languages! ]]>Comment on The Beginning of NeXT by mikecane http://programming-musings.org/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31337 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:17:05 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/10/09/the-beginning-of-next/#comment-31337What happened? When I try to play them, I get:

>>> This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.

]]>Comment on Peter Naur by j http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/03/peter-naur/#comment-31336 Thu, 07 Apr 2011 04:55:16 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/03/peter-naur/#comment-31336Nice summary of Naur’s accomplishments. Thanks! ]]>Comment on Programmers go bananas by Exploring the meaning of Tron Legacy « Tekkie http://programming-musings.org/2006/03/17/programmers-go-bananas/#comment-31329 Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:48:15 +0000https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/programmers-go-bananas/#comment-31329[...] recently on Category Theory, and it’s application to programmable systems, called, “Programmers go bananas,” by José Ortega-Ruiz, that “isomorph” is a term used in mathematics. Just [...] ]]>Comment on Programmers love writing (and mocking) tests by Rob Mills http://programming-musings.org/2006/01/25/programmers-love-writing-and-mocking-tests/#comment-31321 Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:41:48 +0000http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/01/25/programmers-love-writing-and-mocking-tests/#comment-31321I would have to agree with your title. ]]>